[As slightly modified from the original post]
I'm back, at least temporarily, and trying my best to be rational.
Next Tuesday is the Texas Primary, and I've been waffling about who I'll vote for. One day I'm certain it will be Obama, the next I switch to Clinton. I have enormous issues with both of them, and the issues are not positive.
Obama's experience is somewhat thin and I've seen several examples of gullibility and misunderstanding about foreign policy. Those issues give me cause for concern about him; while I think it's reasonable to hope, I think it's more reasonable to base that hope on clear, well-crafted policies and processes. I'm concerned that hoping to change things is not enough; in order to make it happen, there has to be meat on the bones of policy. But I do like his fervor and I appreciate his almost missionary zeal about change. On the other hand, his missionary zeal and his charisma, while moving in a very real sense, are of questionable value to the performance of a commander in chief. I like the idea of a Black person finally getting into the office of President of the United States; it's time Black people have the opportunity to realistically believe that they can really become President. That having been said, I think it would be sheer idiocy to simply elect a person because he or she is Black.
Clinton has more experience than Obama and she understands conventional foreign policy. The problem with that is that our conventional foreign policy is based on an imperialist mindset that belongs in the 15th century. She is recognized and acknowledged around the world as having leadership characteristics, though she's also seen as strident and bitchy. I view her as somewhat cold and aloof but, again, what does one's lack of charisma have to do with one's ability to be commander in chief? I particularly like the idea of a woman becoming President. It's about time men get over the idea that they have the divine right to power. Clinton had the advantage of being in the thick of things while her husband was President, so she undoubtably understands much of the political superstructure that surrounds that office.
If either one of them become President, I will be absolutely delirious with joy. But I have to pull the lever or mark the ballot or do whatever else I have to do on Tuesday, March 4, so who is it going to be?
If I were the king of the universe or had absolute control over who would become President, it would be neither of them. Someone who is more principled than either of them would be in office. Someone who actually gives a damn about people and who could be counted on to work for the PEOPLE, not the special interests, would be in line to get my vote. But we're stuck with the only options remaining available to us: Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton. Of course, I could say that John McCain is an option, but that would be kin to saying my options for my headache are aspirin or ibuprophen...or, then, there's the gun.
My uncomfortable choice is: Hillary Clinton. She'll get my vote on Tuesday.